Security Council Calls for Intervention in the Central African Republic

The increasing levels of violence in the Central African Republic, coupled with the destruction of vital state institutions, has led the United Nations to act with uncharacteristic speed and agreement.  (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/07/world/africa/united-nations-central-african-republic.html?ref=africa) The Security Council, with France seemingly leading the charge, announced today that it will soon be proposing a “large and robust” force of peacekeepers to be sent to the C.A.R. to protect citizens from violence, which includes reports of ethnic cleansing.  The proposed peacekeeping forces, which would be sent to C.A.R. “immediately” would number around 12,000 and would be made up of soldiers and police officers.  In addition to peacekeeping forces, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has recommending the deployment of civilian specialists who would be responsible for repairing and rebuilding the many civic institutions that have been destroyed in the crisis. 

In a press release today the Security Council emphasized the need for a “multidimensional approach” to deal with both the humanitarian crises in the country as well as the significant security concerns for both the country’s citizens and neighboring states.  They stated that while French and MISCA forces, which are currently in the country, have saved lives but are simply not a large enough force to provide the level of security needed countrywide.  Additionally, on the humanitarian front, they note that current efforts are hugely underfunded.  Of the $551 million appeal made for humanitarian efforts only 16 percent has been made available.  This humanitarian assistance is desperately needed, as Valerie Amos, Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, has stated to provide for the 650,000 people currently internally displaced and living in “appalling conditions”. (http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2014/sc11308.doc.htm )

Is it too little, too late?  A “speedy” response from an organization like the UN could still take months.    If they are successful in bringing some moderate level of stability to the country, and end the worst of the violence that brought the crisis to international attention, will international support for the absolutely necessary post-conflict aid dry up?  There is no lack of examples of the international community taking action to bring an end to conflict, but then not providing the support after the crisis has died down to prevent it from occurring again. 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Security Council Calls for Intervention in the Central African Republic

  1. mconley2014 says:

    My group is doing CAR for our presentation on Monday, so I’ve done a lot of research on this topic and you make a good point about the so-called speedy response. I can’t remember which article it was, but I read somewhere that it would take 6 to 8 months for the UN to actually provide the force, and that is IF the proposal passes through the Security Council which, as we saw with Syria, is not always a sure thing.

  2. amandacatalina says:

    This is a really interesting post. I think it’s a really good example of the problems associated with relying on international structures for security or justice. I think this sends a message much like one of the earlier posts, on Katanga and the ICC, that international actions are often significant but delayed.

  3. waljemr says:

    Working on capacity building on the other side of the continent I have learned that all too often aid is promised in lieu of doing anything substantive. Needs are often poorly elucidated, especially in conflict zones with poor security, and there is rarely anything resembling a plan to implement promised aid. Jut as the criticism of one failed initiative begins though, another plan, even larger in scope is often released, taking the heat off for the moment as the world oos and awes over the newest aid figure. What is needed is a mechanism to coordinate capacity building activities in such a way that gaps are easily identified, overlaps de-conflicted, and progress tracked. This would improve both the reach of humanitarian aid, and the opportunities available for predatory graft by elites.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s