Militant Attacks on the Eve of the Third Anniversary of Egypt’s Uprising, Demonstrates the Country’s Continued Struggle towards Democratic Consolidation

Democratic consolidation continues to elude the Egyptian people as the most recent militant attack on Cairo’s police headquarters demonstrates.

The February 2011 overthrow of Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak signaled the transition of a non-democratic regime. One of the biggest misconceptions made by analysts, most notably in Western democracies, is their belief that citizens of non-democratic regimes take part in events to push for regime change because they want a democratic system. Rather, it is more likely citizens were simply dissatisfied with the regime they had in place.

Egypt’s uprising came as a response to a specific regional change, the uprising in Tunisia. When such a dramatic event happens in a neighboring country, it is going to have an effect. Both Tunisia and Egypt were experiencing  similar authoritarian regimes. Since Tunisia was the first domino to fall, it paved the way for similar events throughout North Africa. This is not to make a deterministic argument, but instead suggests that there is a contamination effect.

Hosni Mubarak was approved by a national referendum to become Egypt’s new president after the assassination of Anwar al-Sadat in 1981 and served until 2011.  Similarly, Tunisia’s President Ben Ali, who won the presidency in 1989, served until Tunisia’s  uprising in December 2010.

The fact that Mohammed Morsi became Egypt’s first democratically elected President was a significant step towards democracy, whether the Egyptian people had intended for democracy or not. Renowned theorist Adam Przeworski, believes elections should not only be repetitive, but repetitive under the same conditions. Using this as part of the definition for what constitutes a democratic state, it is clear that Egypt continues to struggle with regime change.

Morsi’s ousting by a military coup last July not only angered many of his supporters, but this post-election event is evidence of Egypt’s failure to consolidate as well.

When the process of democratization starts, there are only one of two options a country can choose- move forward towards democratization, or step backwards, thus halting the process and reverting back to the old regime. Although Morsi campaigned on the promise that his administration would be a more inclusive government, it became clear after his election that his agenda included transforming Egypt into a much more Islamist state. This signaled the new president was providing more of the same as the previous authoritarian regime. The fact that there was so much discontentment among Egyptians because of Morsi’s failure to keep his promises  further handicaps consolidation of democracy, because the citizens are not supportive of the current regime. This inevitably led to Morsi’s highly undemocratic removal.

According to a BBC News correspondent, Kevin Connolly, there is a joke spreading throughout Egypt, “When you get elected here [Egypt], they tell you, you serve two terms. One in the presidential palace, then one in prison.” Such sentiment may make it difficult for democracy to establish stable roots within Egypt as a result of the Egyptian peoples’ unfavorable experience with democracy after its’ transition.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Militant Attacks on the Eve of the Third Anniversary of Egypt’s Uprising, Demonstrates the Country’s Continued Struggle towards Democratic Consolidation

  1. It would be interesting to look at survey evidence to see exactly what the motivations of protestors have been–i.e. simple regime change vs. democratic institutions, etc.

  2. mjfarah says:

    Times Magazine has an interesting profile of Abdul Fattah al-Sisi and the historical rule of the Egyptian military. Here is the link– http://world.time.com/2014/01/27/egypt-sisi-army-president-scaf/

  3. amandacatalina says:

    I think you make an interesting point that citizens were not necessarily demanding democratic institutions or democratization. It seems that for some citizens it is mostly about improving personal living conditions, either through democratization or through another method. I agree with Dr. Kryzanek that it would be really interesting to examine a survey of motivations and goals of protestors.

  4. amandacatalina says:

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/157046/egypt-tahrir-transition.aspx#1

    On this survey, about halfway down the page, there is a survey about political parties in Egypt and the percentage of people who support them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s